Epidemiology and treatment of invasive Bartonella spp. infections in the United States.

OBJECTIVES: Bartonella spp., renowned for cat-scratch disease, has limited reports of dissemination. Tissue and blood cultures have limitations in detecting this fastidious pathogen. Molecular testing (polymerase chain reaction, PCR) and cell-free DNA have provided an avenue for diagnoses. This retrospective observational multicenter study describes the incidence of disseminated Bartonella spp. and treatment-related outcomes. METHODS: Inclusion criteria were diagnosis of bartonellosis via diagnosis code, serology testing of blood, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of blood, 16/18S tests of blood or tissue, cultures of blood or tissue, or cell-free DNA of blood or tissue from January 1, 2014, through September 1, 2021. Exclusions were patients who did not receive treatment, insufficient data on treatment course, absence of dissemination, or retinitis as dissemination. RESULTS: Patients were primarily male (n = 25, 61.0%), white (n = 28, 68.3%), with mean age of 50 years (SD 14.4), and mean Charlson comorbidity index of 3.5 (SD 2.1). Diagnosis was primarily by serology (n = 34, 82.9%), with Bartonella henselae (n = 40, 97.6%) as the causative pathogen. Treatment was principally doxycycline with rifampin (n = 17, 41.5%). Treatment failure occurred in 16 (39.0%) patients, due to escalation of therapy during treatment (n = 5, 31.3%) or discontinuation of therapy due to an adverse event or tolerability (n = 5, 31.3%). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, this is the largest United States-based cohort of disseminated Bartonella spp. infections to date with a reported 39% treatment failure. This adds to literature supporting obtaining multiple diagnostic tests when Bartonella is suspected and describes treatment options.

Can't keep it SECRET: system evaluation of carbapenem restriction against empirical therapy.

Objectives: Carbapenems are appealing agents for empirical use given their broad spectrum of activity; however, selective use is vital in minimizing the risk for development of carbapenem-resistant pathogens. We aimed to examine the impact of carbapenem restriction criteria and a pre-authorization process on utilization and cost savings across a health system. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted across five adult hospitals. The pre-implementation period was 8 February 2020 to 30 April 2020 and the post-implementation period was 8 February 2022 to 30 April 2022. The primary outcome was to compare the number of orders for carbapenems between the study periods for both the intervention and non-intervention hospitals. Secondary outcomes included projected annual cost and an estimated cost-savings evaluation using a stratified analysis for the intervention and non-intervention facilities to account for more resource-limited settings. Results: The total number of carbapenem orders decreased between study periods at the intervention hospital (246 versus 61, P < 0.01). At the non-intervention hospitals, orders decreased, although not significantly (333 versus 279, P = 0.58). Meropenem orders decreased by 66% compared with 12% for the intervention and the non-intervention hospitals, respectively (P < 0.001). Annual estimated cost for all facilities was $255 561 in the pre-implementation period compared with $29 593 in the post-implementation period (P < 0.001). Using a stratified analysis to account for available resources, the estimated annual cost saving was $225 968 for the system. Conclusions: Implementation of carbapenem restriction at the intervention hospital decreased utilization and provided significant cost savings. Furthermore, resource-limited facilities can still experience significant cost savings using a stratified antimicrobial stewardship intervention approach.

Criteria Restricting Inappropriate Meropenem Empiricism (CRIME): a quasi-experimental carbapenem restriction pilot at a large academic medical centre.

The broad-spectrum activity of carbapenems makes them appealing for empirical use; however, they are associated with development of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) and multidrug resistance. Selective carbapenem use is vital in maintaining their effectiveness. We examined the impact of meropenem restriction criteria on utilisation and patient outcomes. This quasi-experimental study was conducted at a single academic medical centre after medication use evaluation found frequent inappropriate meropenem utilisation. Antimicrobial stewardship-led restriction criteria were developed and implemented in February 2022. Investigators aimed to determine how restriction criteria affected meropenem utilisation across 8 weeks in the pre- (February-April 2020) versus post-implementation period (February-April 2022). The primary outcome was inappropriateness of meropenem utilisation. Secondary outcomes included days of therapy per 1000 patient-days (DOT/1000 PD), hospital length of stay (LOS), CDI Standardized Infection Ratio (SIR), and acquisition cost. Across the 8-week timeframes, reductions in inappropriate meropenem use (64.5% vs. 12.8%; P < 0.001), duration of therapy [5.8 (3.2-7.3) vs. 2.4 (1.0-5.5) days; P < 0.001] and utilisation (30.5 vs. 8.3 DOT/1000 PD; P < 0.001) pre- versus post-implementation were observed. Total meropenem orders decreased by 65% (P < 0.001). Median hospital LOS also decreased between periods [11.9 (7.8-20.4) vs. 9.2 (5.4-15.2) days], although not statistically significant (P = 0.051). There was no difference in CDI SIR (0.1 vs. 0.1; P = 0.99). Projected annual cost savings were ∼US$57 300. Implementation of antimicrobial stewardship-initiated restriction criteria can reduce inappropriate meropenem utilisation, overall number of orders, and total duration of therapy.

Use of Prothrombin Complex Concentrate in Oral Anticoagulant-Associated Major Bleeding.

Severe bleeding remains the most significant adverse effect associated with both warfarin and the direct oral anticoagulant agents. Due to the life-threatening nature of these bleeds, knowledge and understanding of agents that are able to rapidly overcome the anticoagulation effects of these medications is paramount to their use. Worldwide, the most commonly used agent for this indication is prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC). This review summarizes the evidence on the use of PCC in this population and provides practical information regarding patient-specific administration considerations.

SGLT-2 Inhibitor Use in Heart Failure: A Review for Nurses.

Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors (empagliflozin, canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, and ertugliflozin) are a new class of heart failure medications that have previously been exclusively utilized in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The rationale for using SGLT-2 inhibitors in patients with heart failure has stemmed from recent landmark clinical trials in T2DM in which reductions in mortality and hospitalization for heart failure were first observed. On the basis of these robust outcomes, empagliflozin has further been evaluated in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and preserved ejection fraction and dapagliflozin solely in the management of HFrEF. While cardiovascular outcomes among each agent vary depending on the patient population, updates among both the American and European guidelines have included SGLT-2 inhibitors as pillars of therapy. The exact mechanisms for how SGLT-2 inhibitors are beneficial in heart failure are unknown, but current hypotheses include multiple metabolic and hemodynamic mechanisms. The purpose of this review is to summarize available literature focusing on the use of the SGLT-2 inhibitors as adjunctive therapy in heart failure, as well as evaluate mechanisms for heart failure benefit, adverse effects, and practical considerations for using these agents in the clinical setting.

Challenges of Combining Opioids and P2Y12 Inhibitors in Acute Coronary Syndrome: Should the Future Be Opioid Free?

Morphine has been long recognized as standard of care in the treatment of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients; however, its safety has recently been called into question due to a drug interaction with P2Y12 inhibitors. Opioids, given in combination with P2Y12 inhibitors, can reduce antiplatelet effects by slowing gastrointestinal motility and ultimately reducing drug absorption. While there are proposed benefits of opioids in ACS patients, conflicting data regarding clinical outcomes exist. The majority of clinical data slightly favors opioid use in ST-elevation myocardial infarction over non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction, although trends for increased myocardial infarction are present in both settings. Current practice should be aimed at discerning the need for routine opioid use in ACS. Alternative strategies may be needed to overcome these interactions; however, no robust data are currently available to support these treatment options. Future research should be aimed at non-opioid treatment options in ACS, as opioid use remains controversial in this population.